Scenario Planning versus Traditional Forecasting
Many executives in the corporate world are now exploring
various methods to foresee potential disruptions and be ready for the future of
uncertainty. The phrases scenario planning and forecasting tend to be used
interchangeably and inconsistently, leading to misunderstandings. However,
these approaches vary in how they achieve their goals and what they provide.
Discussion
Scenario planning
Is your company or organization prepared for what lies
ahead? Strategic planning may benefit significantly from scenario planning, a
fascinating but underused corporate strategy. The tool helps businesses see how
different scenarios affect their ability to compete. It broadens the view that
leaders may have to include potential possibilities and hazards that lie beyond
the immediate future. Scenario planning is a tool for thinking about the future
of your company, industry, and the globe by asking what may happen if specific
trends continue. Scenario planning allows leaders and managers to (and assist
you in preparing for) future developments that may alter the political, social,
and economic landscapes in ways that substantially influence your company. It
is helpful to think about how changes in technology and the introduction of new
rivals can affect your company. It is also helpful to analyze difficulties that
are only faintly recognized as possible issues at present
Scenario planning is a technique that helps businesses
prepare for the future by visualizing prospective solutions or situations, how
they might develop through time, how to react to such changes, and what
potential benefits there would be to doing so. Incorporating quantitative and
qualitative techniques, this strategy "enables a top-down/bottom-up
approach, as well as looking ahead and assessing how a portfolio may respond to
specific market situations" (Schultz, 2021). Businesses and people may
create flexible responses to unanticipated challenges by using various
perspectives. Additionally, scenario planning enables the formulation of many
potential scenarios that may be followed depending on the discovered
uncertainties that arise for present citations.
The process for developing scenarios includes the following
steps:
1.
Define the scope
2.
Identify the major stakeholders
3.
Identify basic trends
4.
Identify key uncertainties
5.
Construct initial scenario themes
6.
Check for consistency and plausibility
7.
Develop learning scenarios
8.
8. Identify research needs
9.
Develop quantitative models
10. Evolve
toward decision scenarios
There are many different ways to approach scenario planning.
As a field that has developed more in the real world than any other, there is
still much that is not understood. As a result, scenario projects may be
carried out in various ways. Keough &
Shanahan (2008) discovered the features common to many models and
processes, intending to consolidate these features into a best practice
strategy. In this article, the writers explain in depth many well-known
scenario planning models, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Following this, they address potential avenues for further establishing best
practices regarding a sound approach to scenario planning and provide the
foundation for a unified model to study scenario planning further.
Decision-makers and academics within the field are offered recommendations and
final thoughts.
Traditional forecasting
Conventional forecasting, which adheres to a more regimented
analytical approach, emphasizes the numerical inferences drawn from studying
historical and current data within a particular domain. This strategy takes a
more probabilistic approach to planning by significantly relying on acquired
data and the ability to assess its correctness. It is a data-driven, unbiased
approach that helps businesses see the bigger picture of how recent trends have
evolved and how they can use that knowledge to provide innovative solutions
Forecasting versus scenario planning
|
Forecasting |
Scenario Planning |
Purpose |
Prediction of the future based on
past historical information Planning for one future state |
Thinking to consider potential
futures based on risks & uncertainties |
Certainty |
Probable |
Plausible |
Information Type |
Quantitative |
Qualitative & Quantitative |
Risks & Uncertainties |
It does not factor in risks and
uncertainties, more about certainty |
Considers risks &
uncertainties |
Testing |
Can be tested for accuracy |
Challenging to test for accuracy |
Theoretical Basis |
Based on a theoretical model Future and be predicted |
Based on relationships and
causality Future is unpredictable |
Stakeholder Engagement |
Narrow stakeholders involved in
the process |
A comprehensive set of
stakeholders involved in the process from across the organization, both
internal and external |
Objectivity |
Objective – fact-based |
Subjective- guessing and
assumptions |
Accountability |
Expert analysts, financial
planners |
CEO, top-level executives, CSO,
facilitators, and consultants |
Frequency |
Used daily |
Used every 2-3 years |
Horizon |
Short term perspective |
Long term perspective |
Repeatability |
Results can be replicated. |
Involves unique representations |
Conclusion
If you are trying to decide between scenario planning and
forecasting as a means of approaching a challenge or opportunity, here are six
common questions to ask yourself, as recommended by Mortlock (2021):
·
To what extent is the future open and
unpredictable or fixed and dependable?
·
Does probability favor a single possible outcome,
or does it allow for more than one?
·
Is there an emphasis on a quantitative or
qualitative approach?
·
Is the goal of the meeting to have a debate with
stakeholders based on facts and data or to have a more open and free-flowing
exchange of ideas?
·
Is the time horizon being sought by the company
shorter (within a year) or longer (many years out)?
·
Can these analyses be repeated regularly, or do
they provide a real-time snapshot?
References
Keough, S. M., & Shanahan, K. J. (2008).
Scenario planning: Towards a more complete model for practice. Advances in
Developing Human Resources, 10(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307313311
Mortlock, L. (2021, May 12). Scenario Planning
versus Forecasting. Retrieved from Leadership Now: Leading Blog:
https://www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2021/05/scenario_planning_vs_forecasti.html#:~:text=Scenarios%20provide%20longer%2Dterm%2C%20multiple,much%20like%20it%20does%20today.
Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool
for strategic thinking. MIT Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25-50. https://enlazate.kuikmatch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2021/06/Scenario-Planning-2.pdf
Wade, W. (2014, September 3). Scenario planning: Thinking
differently about future innovation. GLOBIS Professional
Seminar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKhUKHzE8hk
Comments
Post a Comment