Innovative Discoveries: Serendipity, Errors, and Exaptation

 



One does not have to look far to find the innovation imperative. It jumps out from myriad strategic plans and strategy documents, each emphasizing the importance of innovation to our customers, shareholders, business, future, and, most importantly, our survival and growth. Advertising campaigns for anything from automobiles to mobile phones to luxury automobiles demand ingenuity. It is buried deep within our annals of history, demonstrating how far and how long it has affected our lives. Every politician acknowledges that the process of innovation is continuously shaping and reshaping our lifestyles.

Corporations, nonprofits, and many other types of organizations of all sizes and forms benefit immensely from creativity. The argument is straightforward: if an organization does not change and improve what it gives the world (products and services) and how it generates and offers them, its chance of being surpassed by those that do. It is all about survival, and history has shown us that survival is not a need! Those businesses that endure do so because they can change regularly and strategically (Tidd & Bessant, 2021).

Discussion

Many research studies have been conducted to study the elements influencing the success of new goods. Most have used a ‘matched-pair’ methodology, an experimental design in which study scenarios are matched depending on important variables or common qualities relevant to the investigation's issue. This allows business managers to distinguish between good and bad practices and helps to account for other factors. Common factors that affect a product’s success or failure include:

·         Competitive advantage

·         Market understanding

·         Comprehensive product definition

·         Risk evaluation

·         Product classification

·         Project assets

·         Execution ability

·         Senior leadership and management support

When researchers have questioned managers on how they come up with their most innovative ideas, they have described processes that range from cryptic and intuitive to lucky accidents and serendipitous discoveries. Although specific revolutionary innovations or products, such as anesthesia, started accidentally, the general rule is that chance favors carefully laid plans (Tidd & Bessant, 2021). In the case of anesthesia, attendees at "laughing parties" in the early 1800s frequently consumed ether and nitrous gas. After the jeers subsided, it was realized that the material could be used to dull pain, and anesthesia was developed (InterFocus, 2021).

Serendipity

Like biological evolution, which allows organisms to thrive in a changing environment, organizational innovation allows for growth and development. Nevertheless, as knowledge of evolution has grown, the factors that motivate new ideas have remained unclear. Organizations spend much money on systematic ways to speed up the creative process. However, research into the past and personal experience points to the importance of luck and chance. To reconcile these divergent viewpoints, Fink et al. ( 2017) analyzed the mathematics of innovation as a hunt for designs throughout a universe of component building blocks. Data from several fields, including language, cuisine, and technology, were used to validate our hypotheses. By keeping track of the number of feasible designs as the researchers add new parts, they have found that component usefulness can change over time. Unexpected crossovers give the impression of being the outcome of pure chance. However, Fink et al. ( 2017) suggest that an organization can intentionally increase the expansion of the product space if it knows when crossovers will occur in the first place.

Strategic errors

Errors are a fact of life for any company. While most mistakes can be easily fixed, some can have severe outcomes if not addressed. Error prevention is frequently seen as the sole method used by organizations to address the issue of errors. Frese and Keith (2015) conclude that error prevention efforts should be complemented by error management, a method aimed at efficiently addressing problems once they have happened (examples of the latter are learning and innovations). The researchers begin by describing mistakes and associated concepts, then survey the literature on how error management affects various processes involved with errors (error detection, damage control). The emotional, motivational, cognitive, and behavioral pathways of the beneficial benefits of error management on individuals and organizations are then examined. The formation of a mindset of acceptance of human error is one of the conditions necessary for learning from mistakes, as is the case with other positive outcomes.

Expactation

One technique of novelty production in invention that has not gotten much attention is exaptation or the discovery of previously unrecognized uses for existing artifacts.

Exaptation was first hypothesized in biology as an alternate evolutionary strategy to adaptation (Gould & Vrba, 1982). While adaptation refers to traits created to perform a specific job, exaptation refers to features created for one function but later identified to do another. Exaptation is feasible in an innovation setting since all of the future potential uses of technology cannot be predicted in advance.

 The frequency of exaptation in the pharmaceutical business is quantified here. Andriani, Ali, & Mastrogiorgio's (2017) research shows that around 42% of the novel activities discovered in current medications are exaptive in nature. Andriani, Ali, & Mastrogiorgio (2017) establish a connection between exaptation and radical innovation and discover that the vast majority of radical inventions in our sample are exaptive. Furthermore, most game-changing developments occur in unrelated markets to the drug's initial one. The researchers argue that exaptive creativity is distinct from purposeful and accidental innovation in terms of its search mechanism and approach to addressing problems.

As the COVID‐19 pandemic spread across the globe in the first quarter of 2020, demand for specialized equipment in hospitals soared. As a result, firms from various sectors repurposed their design and manufacturing to create new products in days. By examining 80 cases of this accelerated innovation, the work of Liu, Beltagui, & Ye (2021)  investigates how a shared purpose drives change in the innovation process. It applies the lens of exaptation – the discovery of unintended functions for technologies – to explain how product complexity and ecosystem structure affect accelerated innovation in this context. The research extends the application of exaptation to manufacturing and product design; it identifies a relationship between complexity, exaptation, and ecosystems. The research suggests that the ability to exapt design and manufacturing can determine a firm's ecosystem role. These results lead to implications for theory and practice during the response to and recovery from the crisis.

Conclusion

The need to innovate is readily apparent. It is glaringly evident in the plethora of plans and documents that emphasize the significance of innovation to our clients, investors, company, future, and, most importantly, our continued existence and development. Researchers asking managers how they get their most novel ideas have heard everything from cryptic, intuitive leaps to a series of fortuitous, accidental findings. Organizational innovation permits expansion and development, like biological evolution permits organisms to adapt to a shifting environment. Like many other good results, learning from mistakes requires the development of a mindset that accepts the possibility of human imperfection. Exaptation, or the finding of new uses for existing artifacts, is a strategy of novelty production in invention that has received little attention. Creativity, which is mainly driven by chance, learning from strategic blunders, and expectation, is of great value to businesses, nonprofits, and other organizations of all kinds and shapes.

 References

Andriani, P., Ali, A., & Mastrogiorgio, M. (2017). Measuring expactation and ints impact on innovation, search, and problem solving. Organization Science, 28(2), 177-377. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1116

Fink, T. M., Reeves, M., Palma, R., & Farr, R. S. (2017). Serendipity and strategy in rapid innovation. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02042-w

Frese, M., & Keith, N. (2015). Action errors, error management, and learning organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 661-687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205

Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300004310

InterFocus. (2021, December 14). Some of the greatest scientific breakthroughs have been accidentally discovered from within a laboratory. My New Lab Website: https://www.mynewlab.com/blog/accidental-scientific-discoveries-and-breakthroughs/

Liu, W., Beltagui, A., & Ye, S. (2021). Accelerated innovation through repurposing: exaptation of design and manufacturing in response to COVID‐19. R & D Management, 51(4), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12460

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2021). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change (7th. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Think Tanks and Futuring