Sociotechnical Plan

Augmented Reality-Enabled Aircraft Maintenance Documentation System

for

Urban Air Mobility Vehicles

 Abstract

This initiative aims to let maintenance personnel transmit their unique systems expertise in real-time via augmented reality without learning a complicated interface or utilizing expensive technology in urban air mobility vehicles. The proposed sociotechnical system is to be examined for practicality and flaws. One of the businesses that require the most significant amount of capital investment is aviation's civil sector. Even the most minor enhancements to an asset's functioning and maintenance can result in considerable cost savings and efficiency, mainly when such assets use parts with a high unit cost and a low production volume. The Internet of Things (IoT) and augmented reality are two of the most popular and widely discussed technologies expected to undergo significant development in 2017. These technologies will start to unlock real benefits for companies involved in civil aviation, such as airlines and maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facilities.


 

The Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concept aims to create a reliable and cost-effective air transport network that operates at lower altitudes within urban and suburban areas and uses increasingly automated aircraft to transport passengers or goods. By providing an alternative to driving on surface roads in the form of an air taxi, UAM hopes to ease traffic on the nation's highways and byways (Verma et al., 2020). The UAM ecosystem will include aircraft development and safety, an operational framework, airspace availability, infrastructure building, and public participation. In contrast, advanced air mobility (AAM) expands upon the UAM framework to include scenarios outside of urban settings. A primary UAM use case may include transporting goods for businesses over long distances. Other alternative use cases include taxi cabs, private security, and recreational vehicles (FAA, 2022).

Figure 1

Urban air mobility vehicle

Adapted from (Alcock, 2020)

Given the characteristics of the aircraft, the initial UAM ecosystem will use preexisting helicopter infrastructures like routes, helipads, and Air Traffic Control (ATC) services. Currently, the FAA is trying to figure out what infrastructure will be required to support these planes in the future. It is anticipated that a new vertiport standard will be developed by FAA soon. 

From the European Union's perspective, UAM is a revolutionary air transportation system that is safer, more secure, and more sustainable for transporting passengers and freight in urban environments. Modern technologies make this system possible and are incorporated into multimodal transportation systems. The transportation is carried out by electric aircraft capable of taking off and landing vertically, and they can either be flown remotely or have a pilot on board. It is anticipated that commercial operations will begin in cities within the E.U. around the year 2025, with items being delivered by drones and passengers being transported by piloted planes (EASA, 2022).

Next-generation maintenance framework for UAM  vehicles

Global commerce should expect a dramatic shift in how people and goods are transported thanks to the advent of UAM vehicles. Maximizing operational efficiency using the next-generation Maintenance framework is one of the primary areas to investigate. UAM's operational models could significantly alter aircraft upkeep procedures. Flying at low altitudes is an integral part of UAM. This opens the door to using cellular technologies for air-to-ground and air-to-air communication. It follows that the notion of Digital Twin can be used to optimize the operation and maintenance as a low-cost, high-speed air-to-ground data pipe accessible. This allows the status of the UAM vehicle and its components to be monitored in near real-time, even while in flight.

Augmented reality

One definition of augmented reality (AR) is a live, direct or indirect sensory experience of a real-world physical environment that has been digitally augmented with computer-generated sensory input. AR blends the real world with computer-generated imagery. It is 3D, may be interacted with, and registered (Carmignian & Furht, 2011). Milgram's Reality-Virtuality Continuum described by Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino (1995) places AR on one end of the spectrum and Augmented Virtuality (AV) on the other, with AR being the more grounded in the actual world and AV the more immersed in the virtual.

AR-enabled aircraft maintenance

The United States Air Force (USAF) invests heavily in addressing the increase in aviation accidents caused by an overburdened and understaffed maintenance sector and a high operating tempo. Currently, technicians examine, service, and repair airplanes using paper-based technical orders (TO). Many civilian agencies are implementing AR systems to keep up with the times and increase productivity. This sociotechnical plan describes a sociotechnical system incorporating AR into UAM vehicle maintenance to improve the precision and efficiency with which maintenance tasks are completed. The goal is to improve the effectiveness of augmented reality technical order (TO) maintenance manuals compared to traditional paper TO. Based on the data collected, it can be concluded that augmented reality TO creates from both USAF and commercial perspectives will help speed up workflow and cut down on basic mistakes. The efficiency and uptake of AR inside an organization depend on its ability to provide results distinct from previous studies and applications. Experimental research also indicates the need to overcome present organizational infrastructure limitations before implementing the technology throughout a maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facility (Hebert, 2019).

Supply chain management using AR

Rejeb et al. (2021) explore AR technology's applications in supply chain management (SCM) and logistics. The researchers focus on the technology's utility to businesses and present an outline of its many potential benefits. Rigorous research studying the potential of AR for SCM and logistical activities is scarce. However, the rise of Industry 4.0 has rekindled interest in AR and how it might address various difficulties facing existing business models. The researchers did a comprehensive literature study to organize AR research in supply chain management and logistics and fill in the gaps in our knowledge. A total of 43 publications were carefully examined. This research shows that augmented reality can improve five distinct business processes: inventory management, product development; sales and outdoor logistics; facility layout; and H.R. management. Additionally, the authors examine businesses' difficulties when implementing AR in SCM and logistics.

Promise of AR

The advantages of using augmented reality applications for upkeep are well-known. The prevalence of high-performance intelligent devices as the norm for mobile devices bodes well for their practical implementation. When services must be performed in a no-photography zone, complications arise. Even if the technician prefers not to utilize paper and pencil, he may always rely on the information provided by his maintenance assistance system. Depending on the accessibility of an internal camera and the constraints of the work environment, the authors elaborate on a concept that provides context-sensitive assistance, a highly dynamic data model, and different views. A complicated hydraulic system was used as a laboratory demonstration machine to test and confirm the provided method. The prototype will be the basis for an industrial case study exploring the Internet of Things-enabled machinery with intelligent devices for preventative maintenance (Abramovici, Wolf, & Negas, 2017).

Scope

Maintaining today's machine tools' ever-growing complexity and uniqueness is challenging and time-consuming. The maintenance engineer can benefit from AR's visualization of the process with individual working stages and other straightforward information. Rapid and automated AR-based documentation generation, including the incorporation of preexisting systems and data like technical documentation, CAD models, and PDM data, is essential for a successful rollout. This saves time and energy by preventing the need to rewrite and create the AR-based documentation from scratch in addition to the regular paper-based version. Consequently, several theories for developing augmented reality-based technical documentation for the upkeep of machine tools are provided and validated, along with an examination of the data, systems, and procedures necessary for their creation (Kliment & Kollatch, 2022).

Purpose

This research examines Urban Air Mobility, a new low-altitude air transportation service. Six questions are considered:

1.      What are AR-enabled UAM Maintenances?

2.      What makes this industry possible?

3.      What are UAM AR-enabled maintenance significant issues?

4.      What are UAM AR-enabled maintenance challenges?

5.      When will AR-enabled UAM maintenance be available?

 (Lascara, et al., 2018)

 Maintenance and training are vital to flying safety. The maintenance process comprises several components and extensive procedure expertise. Technicians must follow strict protocols to prevent maintenance mishaps. Airlines are cost-conscious about maintenance time. This plan presents an intelligent augmented reality (IAR) solution to help airplane technicians cope with complicated jobs by employing an intuitive UI/UX interface (Jo et al., 2014).

Supporting Forces

Despite the abundance of digital information at our disposal, there is a significant chasm between the virtual and the material realms. The vast information we currently must guide industry choices and actions is stuck on two-dimensional pages and displays, even though the reality is three-dimensional. Our capacity to benefit from the deluge of data and insights generated by the world's billions of intelligent, connected products (SCPs) is hampered by the gap between the digital and physical spheres. Technology such as augmented reality has the potential to bridge this divide and free latent powers that are distinctively human. Although still in its infancy, augmented reality is expected to join the mainstream, with investment in AR technology expected to reach $60 billion by 2020. Businesses across all sectors, as well as many other institutions (including schools and nonprofits), will be impacted by augmented reality. As a result, how the aerospace maintenance community studies, make decisions and engages with the physical environment will drastically alter in the following months and years. It will also impact how businesses compete in the marketplace and serve consumers, educate workers, develop and manufacture goods, and oversee their value chains (Porter & Heppelman, 2017).

In the early days of AR, researchers were interested in its potential applications in fields as diverse as medicine, manufacturing, entertainment, path planning, and identification. Among the many reasons AR is gaining popularity in both academic and professional settings is its shown capacity to lessen the mental burden of tasks, shorten the amount of time needed to complete them, lower the number of mistakes made, and even make training more efficient.

Challenging Forces

By superimposing computer-generated cues on the actual environment, AR is a well-known technology that may be used to give mass-market consumers effective and personalized support across a wide range of personal applications. A significant contributor to the meteoric rise of these solutions is the prevalence of mobile technology, particularly smartphones and tablets. However, several industries are only now beginning to reap the benefits of AR technology. Since the 1990s, maintenance, repair, and assembly have been identified as critical domains for the deployment of augmented reality technology, although limited experimental studies have usually only engaged professionals utilizing ad hoc hardware. Users may now get AR-based maintenance and repair guides for consumer electronics. In addition to discussing potential future directions for this technology, introduce a software architecture that will use reconfigurable augmented reality techniques and remote help to address some of the problems with existing approaches.

One of the industrial equipment's most costly and time-consuming aspects is its maintenance operations and lifecycle engineering. Many businesses consistently pay significant funds to keep their machinery in working order. For this reason, any optimizations that help lower the number of maintenance mistakes and associated costs would be greatly appreciated. An inadequate supply of specialists results in localized technicians having to perform on-site maintenance on equipment outside their competence area. It is well established that augmented reality (AR) can enhance servicing. At the same time, robust and augmented reality (AR) has obstacles ranging from content development to spatial perception. This paper describes a method that puts augmented reality (AR) and the expertise of a subject matter expert (SME) into the hands of a technician working in the field (Schlueter, 2018).

Before airline deregulation, most companies would do maintenance in-house. Deregulation paved the way for increased use of third-party maintenance providers in an industry where competitive pressures were rising and airlines were failing and succeeding simultaneously. Airlines worldwide, not only in the United States, are turning to third parties to do routine maintenance tasks. The choice to outsource can be influenced by a wide variety of factors, from the inability of a startup to build its in-house maintenance program to the desire of a legacy carrier to cut costs in any way possible. McFadden & Worrels (2012) address aspects of worldwide airplane maintenance outsourcing.

Approaches, departures, landings, takeoffs, passenger loading/unloading, security, and charging/refueling must be considered. The UAM concept of operations development is key to harmonizing infrastructure design and development. “Vertiplaces” should be designed for safe, effective, and robust flight operations. Operators should put vertiports in areas that alleviate congestion and give fair access to people and freight. eVTOL aircraft operations must evaluate and manage noise pollution in vertiport design, positioning, and new building development. Real-time weather monitoring will notify eVTOL aircraft operations of wind gusts, rain, lightning, and snowfall. Predictive and monitoring capabilities enable safer route planning. Unexpected technical failures are inevitable; hence eVTOLs need backup landing locations. A working system needs a high-speed communications network considering urban availability and resilience (Hussain, Rutgers, & Metcalfe, 2019).

Methods

This section presents an approach to dividing labor among machines and people. Tasks within the work system (human-human allocations) and technologically involved tasks within the work system (technological allocations) are both addressed in the method's many stages (human-machine allocations). The technique incorporates a set of criteria for making decisions that let users consider many features of the work, the organization, and the technology when deciding how to divide tasks.

The purpose of this methodology is to facilitate the identification of possible allocation choices and the selection of the most appropriate for use in the design of new systems or the redesign of existing ones. A secondary goal is to thoroughly investigate the allocation of functions among individuals instead of focusing on the distribution of functions between humans and machines, as has been the case with most previous function allocation approaches. Third, the technique seeks to make deliberate design choices that might otherwise be assumed, overlooked, or left to chance. Including a general guideline for its use, such as the recommendation that people from all disciplines involved in the system's design, management, and use be involved in using the approach, is one way to facilitate a detailed examination of design possibilities and alternatives in a workshop setting (Waterson, Gray, & Clegg, 2002).

Table 1 gives the categories and individual requirements for allocating work for the methodology used in this sociotechnical system.

Table 1

Requirements for allocating work

Category

Requirement

Types of allocation

·         Cover allocations to the humans and the machines

·         Cover allocations between humans and examine different human roles

·         Incorporate the concept of dynamic allocations dependent on real-time contingencies

Issues

·         Examine the content and quality of the human’s job

·         Specify decision criteria

·         Consider the trade-offs between the decision criteria

·         Enable quantitative evaluations to be made of the choices

Approach

·         Encourage participative use by various stakeholders, including the potential end users of the system.

·         Enable users of the method to make informed choices

·         Be useable early in the design process

·         Allow iterative use throughout the design process

·         Be easy to learn, usable, and require minimal training and support

Coverage

·         Examine the whole system, as well as individual tasks and roles

·         Apply to complex environments (e.g., high-risk, composite task, variable workload, uncertain, dynamic, time-constrained) and different systems within the same environment

·         Be adaptable to different situations and tailorable for unique application

·         Be capable of use in new and existing systems

·         Cover the rationale for its use (i.e., enable its users to realize its importance during the system development process)

Design

·         Have a structured and systematic format

·         Be cost-effective and efficient in to use

·         Be consistent with existing tools and techniques (e.g., it should fit into the existing system development cycle and form the input for established system development processes).

Note: Reprinted from Older, M. T., Waterson, P. E., & Clegg, C. W. (1997). A critical assessment of task allocation methods and their applicability. Ergonomics, 40, 151-171. Copyright 1997 Taylor & Francis

Analytical Plan

This sociotechnical systems plan adapts a cognitive work analysis workflow described by Stanton & Bessell (2014). This workflow comprises six stages of cognitive work analysis:

1.      Work Domain Analysis

2.      Control Task Analysis

3.      Strategies Analysis

4.      Social Organization

5.      Cooperation Analysis

6.      Worker Competencies Analysis

Cognitive work analysis provides an integrated approach to analyzing large sociotechnical systems, with a functional means-ends analysis at its foundation. The analysis structure provides a logical structure for comprehending the inner workings of complex sociotechnical systems. The goal is to establish a standard against which all subsequent field interpretations may be evaluated. The analysis's power lies in the many representations through which the constraints affecting the task may be analyzed.

Anticipated Results

AR in UAM vehicle maintenance is expected to achieve widespread adoption; however, this will not happen until several hurdles have been addressed. Overcoming these obstacles can make technology more user-friendly and safer to interact with. These problems include technical and social issues that those opposed to technology may raise. The anticipated hurdles are exceedingly complicated, such as developers' capacity to adequately capture the complexity of the urban air mobility vehicle in a model and the ability to reliably and effectively combine the numerous sources of information acquired by the AR system. These difficulties are predicted to emerge soon. There is also the cost issue, which relates to both technological development and end consumers. Willing participant organizations (presumably MRO facilities) may be eligible for government subsidies, though this will depend on the outcomes of any potential regulations that may be enacted.

Conclusion

One of the businesses that require the most significant amount of capital investment is aviation's civil sector. Even the most minor enhancements to an asset's functioning and maintenance can result in considerable cost savings and efficiency, mainly when such assets use parts with a high unit cost and a low production volume. The Internet of Things (IoT) and augmented reality are two of the most popular and widely discussed technologies expected to undergo significant development in 2017. These technologies will start to unlock real benefits for companies involved in civil aviation, such as airlines and maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facilities (Deal, 2017).

Areas of Future Research

In the future, developers may look into developing other display platforms that the on-site technician's mobile app can use. The HoloLens from Microsoft is particularly intriguing because of its wide availability in the market and rich feature set. In order to work with the new Universal Windows Platform (UWP) build target and its hardware restrictions, existing network protocols will need to be reworked. The HoloLens' performance would then be compared to that of a regular mobile device, with further testing focusing on things like framerates and how well maintenance instructions are communicated. The feasibility of in-app voice calling will also be tested. The technician and specialist could convey information such as serial numbers or instruments that may not be seen in the video stream or augmented overlay (Schlueter, 2018).

Finally, comparing this sociotechnical system to a regular audiovisual call would be easier with the help of user research. The research results would be used to make the current system more user-friendly. Users' abilities to troubleshoot and repair a dummy assembly with the help of an AR system or an audiovisual call to a trained technician would be measured in such a study. Quantitative and qualitative data, including how much fun people had, would be collected alongside numbers like average playtime and error rates (Schlueter, 2018).


References

Abramovici, M., Wolf, M., & Negas, M. (2017). Graph-based model for context-aware maintenance assistance with augmented reality and 3D visualization. In L. Redding, R. Roy, & A. Shaw, Advances in through-life engineering services. Cham, CH: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49938-3_22.

Alcock, C. (2020, October 15). Embraer Launches Urban Air Mobility Division Called Eve. AIN Online: https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2020-10-15/embraer-launches-urban-air-mobility-division-called-eve.

Carmignian, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. In B. Furht, Handbook of Augmented Reality. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1.

Deal, K. (2017). Airlines and MRO to benefit from IoT, prescriptive maintenance, augmented reality in 2017. Military and Aerospace Electronics Website: https://www.militaryaerospace.com/commercial-aerospace/article/14229157/airlines-and-mro-to-benefit-from-iot-prescriptive-maintenance-augmented-reality-in-2017.

EASA. (2022). What is UAM? European Union Aviation Safety Agency: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/what-is-uam

FAA. (2022). Urban Air Mobility and Advanced Air Mobility. Federal Aviation Administration Website: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/urban_air_mobility.

Hebert, T. R. (2019, March). Impacts of Using Augmented Reality to Support Aircraft Maintenance. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC): https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1077392.

Hussain, A., Rutgers, V., & Metcalfe, M. (2019, May 30). Infrastructure barriers to the elevated future of mobility: Are cities ready with the infrastructure needed for urban air transportation? Deloitte Insights: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/future-of-mobility/infrastructure-barriers-to-urban-air-mobility-with-VTOL.html.

InterFocus. (2021, December 14). Some of the greatest scientific breakthroughs have been accidentally discovered from within a laboratory. My New Lab Website: https://www.mynewlab.com/blog/accidental-scientific-discoveries-and-breakthroughs/.

Isaksen, S., & Tidd, J. (2006). Meeting the innovation challenge: Leadership for transformation and growth. Wiley, 2006; J.R. Hackman, ed., Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1990. In J. R. Hackman, Meeting the Innovation Challenge: Leadership for transformation and growth. Wiley, 2006.

Jo, G.-S., Oh, K.-J., Ha, I., Lee, K.-S., Hong, M.-D., Neumann, U., & You, S. (2014). A unified framework for augmented reality and knowledge-based systems in maintaining aircraft. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Geun-Sik-Jo/publication/263928575_A_Unified_Framework_for_Augmented_Reality_and_Knowledge-based_Systems_in_Maintaining_Aircraft/links/5614bd6a08aec62244106ec9/A-Unified-Framework-for-Augmented-Reality-and-Knowledge-bas.

Klimant, P., & Kollatch. (2022). Concepts for creating augmented reality based technical documentation for the maintenance of machine tools. International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing, pp. 16, 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00880-7.

Lamberti, F., Manuri, F., Sanna, A., Paravatis, G., Pezzola, P., & Montuschi, P. (2014). Challenges, opportunities, and future trends of emerging techniques for augmented reality-based maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2(4), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2014.2368833.

Lascara, B., Spencer, T., Degarmo, M., Lacher, A., Maroney, D., & Guterres, M. (2018). Urban air mobility landscape report. Washington, DC: MITRE. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1107954.pdf.

McFadden, M., & Worrels, D. S. (2012). Global outsourcing of aircraft maintenance. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314659

Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of SPIE 2351 Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. Boston, MA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321.

Older, M. T., Waterson, P. E., & Clegg, C. W. (1997). A critical assessment of task allocation methods and their applicability. Ergonomics, 40, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397188279.

Porter, M. E., & Heppelman, J. E. (2017, November-December). Why every organization needs an augmented reality strategy. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/11/why-every-organization-needs-an-augmented-reality-strategy.

Rawat, D. B., Doku, R., & Garuba, M. (2021). Cybersecurity in big data era: From securing big data to data-driven security. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 14(6), 2055-2072. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2019.2907247.

Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., Wamba, S. F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2021). The potentials of augmented reality in supply chain management: a state-of-the-art review. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 819-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00201-w.

Schlueter, J. A. (2018). Remote maintenance assistance using real-time augmented reality authoring. (Order No. 10790109) [Master’s Thesis, Ohio State University]. Proquest Disserrtations & Theses Global.

Stanton, N. A., & Bessell, K. (2014). How a submarine returns to periscope depth: Analysing complex sociotechnical systems using cognitive work analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.022.

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2021). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change (7th. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Verma, S. A., Monheim, S. C., Moolchanani, K. A., Pradeep, P., Cheng, A. W., Thipphavong, D. P., . . . Wei, B. (2020). Lessons learned: Using UTM paradigm for urban air mobility operations. 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) (pp. 1–10). Virtual Conference: AIAA/IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256650.

Waterson, P. E., Gray, M. O., & Clegg, C. (2002). A sociotechnical method for designing work systems. Human Factors, 44(3), 376-391. https://doi-org.coloradotech.idm.oclc.org/10.1518/0018720024497628.

 

 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Innovative Discoveries: Serendipity, Errors, and Exaptation

Think Tanks and Futuring